|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
Fecha : |
01/06/2022 |
Actualizado : |
01/06/2022 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Agropecuarias |
Autor : |
BAO, L.; MARTÍNEZ, S.; MOLINA, F.; OXLEY, A.; MARCHESI, C.; TERRA, J.A.; ROEL, A. |
Afiliación : |
LETICIA BAO; SEBASTIÁN MARTÍNEZ KOPP, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FEDERICO MOLINA CASELLA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ALBERTO MATIAS OXLEY BARRIOS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CLAUDIA ELIZABETH MARCHESI GYERMAN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JOSÉ ALFREDO TERRA FERNÁNDEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ALVARO ROEL DELLAZOPPA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Bajo uso relativo de fitosanitarios: una ventaja. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Arroz (ACA), 2021, v.21, no. 104, p. 68-69. |
Idioma : |
Español |
Palabras claves : |
ARROZ; HERBICIDAS; LUCHA INTEGRADA; MANEJO RACIONAL DE FITOSANITARIOS. |
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16458/1/Bajo-uso-relativo-de-fitosanitarios.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 00597nam a2200217 a 4500 001 1063191 005 2022-06-01 008 2021 bl uuuu u01u1 u #d 100 1 $aBAO, L. 245 $aBajo uso relativo de fitosanitarios$buna ventaja.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aArroz (ACA), 2021, v.21, no. 104, p. 68-69.$c2021 653 $aARROZ 653 $aHERBICIDAS 653 $aLUCHA INTEGRADA 653 $aMANEJO RACIONAL DE FITOSANITARIOS 700 1 $aMARTÍNEZ, S. 700 1 $aMOLINA, F. 700 1 $aOXLEY, A. 700 1 $aMARCHESI, C. 700 1 $aTERRA, J.A. 700 1 $aROEL, A.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Treinta y Tres. Por información adicional contacte bibliott@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
Fecha actual : |
18/02/2019 |
Actualizado : |
16/03/2021 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
-- - -- |
Autor : |
DO CARMO, M.; CARDOZO, G.; JAURENA, M.; SOCA, P. |
Afiliación : |
MARTIN DO CARMO CORUJO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. Centro Universitario de la Región Este, UDELAR, Rocha, Uruguay; GERONIMO AGUSTIN CARDOZO CABANELAS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARTIN ALEJANDRO JAURENA BARRIOS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; PABLO SOCA, Estación Experimental "Dr. Mario A. Cassinoni" (EEMAC), Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Paysandú, Uruguay. |
Título : |
Demonstrating control of forage allowance for beef cattle grazing Campos grassland in Uruguay to improve system productivity. [Demostración de la mejora en la productividad de los sistemas ganaderos a través del control de la oferta de forraje sobre pasturas de Campos en Uruguay]. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2019 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Tropical Grasslands-Forrajes Tropicales, 2019, v. 7(1) p. 35-47. |
ISSN : |
2346-3775 |
DOI : |
10.17138/TGFT(7)35-47 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received for publication 09 October 2017; Accepted 19 December 2018; Published 31 Jannuary 2019) |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT: While low-cost technology can be applied within beef cattle systems to improve economic output and decrease economic risk, methodologies to increase adoption by farmers deserve attention. Here we report 4 case studies where low-cost, high-impact technology was applied on commercial farms in an endeavor to demonstrate increased physical output in what we describe as 'Producer Demonstration Sites'. Forage allowance (FA) affects forage growth, forage intake by animals and energy partitioning to maintenance or production. We decided to demonstrate the benefits to production from controlling forage allowance at specific recommended levels. While we focused on FA, other management tools, e.g. suckling restriction and energy supplementation of cows prior to breeding, were tested in different contexts and time periods to improve the critical responses mentioned. While increases in production from 3 of the farms were demonstrated, only 2 of the farmers showed interest in implementing the strategies on their farms subsequently. We conclude that control of forage allowance improved energy intake and animal productivity. For this approach to be successful and increase adoption, it is important to involve the farmers in discussions regarding the proposed changes from the outset as well as the monitoring of progress during the demonstration. |
Palabras claves : |
ANIMAL MANAGEMENT; CATTLE PERFORMANCE; RESEARCH VALIDATION; SPATIAL-TEMPORAL ARRANGEMENT; STOCKING RATE; SUBTROPICAL PASTURES. |
Thesagro : |
MANEJO DE PASTOREO. |
Asunto categoría : |
F40 Ecología vegetal |
Marc : |
LEADER 02486naa a2200277 a 4500 001 1059499 005 2021-03-16 008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a2346-3775 024 7 $a10.17138/TGFT(7)35-47$2DOI 100 1 $aDO CARMO, M. 245 $aDemonstrating control of forage allowance for beef cattle grazing Campos grassland in Uruguay to improve system productivity. [Demostración de la mejora en la productividad de los sistemas ganaderos a través del control de la oferta de forraje sobre pasturas de Campos en Uruguay].$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2019 500 $aArticle history: Received for publication 09 October 2017; Accepted 19 December 2018; Published 31 Jannuary 2019) 520 $aABSTRACT: While low-cost technology can be applied within beef cattle systems to improve economic output and decrease economic risk, methodologies to increase adoption by farmers deserve attention. Here we report 4 case studies where low-cost, high-impact technology was applied on commercial farms in an endeavor to demonstrate increased physical output in what we describe as 'Producer Demonstration Sites'. Forage allowance (FA) affects forage growth, forage intake by animals and energy partitioning to maintenance or production. We decided to demonstrate the benefits to production from controlling forage allowance at specific recommended levels. While we focused on FA, other management tools, e.g. suckling restriction and energy supplementation of cows prior to breeding, were tested in different contexts and time periods to improve the critical responses mentioned. While increases in production from 3 of the farms were demonstrated, only 2 of the farmers showed interest in implementing the strategies on their farms subsequently. We conclude that control of forage allowance improved energy intake and animal productivity. For this approach to be successful and increase adoption, it is important to involve the farmers in discussions regarding the proposed changes from the outset as well as the monitoring of progress during the demonstration. 650 $aMANEJO DE PASTOREO 653 $aANIMAL MANAGEMENT 653 $aCATTLE PERFORMANCE 653 $aRESEARCH VALIDATION 653 $aSPATIAL-TEMPORAL ARRANGEMENT 653 $aSTOCKING RATE 653 $aSUBTROPICAL PASTURES 700 1 $aCARDOZO, G. 700 1 $aJAURENA, M. 700 1 $aSOCA, P. 773 $tTropical Grasslands-Forrajes Tropicales, 2019$gv. 7(1) p. 35-47.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|